CommentaryJanuary 5, 2001

king472

A
Antonio Barrera
Standard Newspapers
6 min read · 1197 words

As the world's most professional boxing,

the flamboyant Don King has become something of a lightning rod for both

the good and the bad in boxing---with the good outweighing the bad by a

considerable margin.  King's best perspective is that he has made

an impression and an impact beyond the ring.

Noted historian Jeffrey P. Sammons, a member

of the History Department at New York University, stated in "Beyond the

Ring: The Role of Boxing in American Society, that King's promotional undertakings

in under-developed countries had far-reaching economic, political and racial

implications.

Sammons' assertions---published by the

University of Illinois Press---apparently drew from the fact that King

made boxing an equal opportunity enterprise for all performers, regardless

of race, creed, or color.

Sammons referred to Don as "A pioneer,

a trailblazer, and an unforgettable figure."

When Don King first entered the closed

world of boxing promotions, boxing had its share of black luminaries, but

their roles were confined to either the ring or the corners.  Muhammad

All, one of the greatest fighters of ail time, said that boxing at that

time reminded him of "two slaves in the ring." Blacks shared disproportionately

in even the majors fights in which they participated, until King came along. 

Within four years of King's arrival, he became the most powerful promoter

in boxing and one of the most successful black businessmen in America,

Sammons noted.

King combined extraordinary business acumen

with a knowledge of what would sell in the ring and transformed the fight

game into one in which blacks could have a bigger piece of boxing's humongous

pie.  He flashed an air of independence, call it arrogance if you

will, that demanded as much inclusion for people of color as anyone else

was able to command.

His action and his success rubbed a lot

of folks the wrong way.  King was a godsend for black and Hispanic

fighters. Their fight purses increased and suddenly they found themselves

as high profile pugilists with a portfolio to boot.

For most of them, it was as if they were

being discovered anew. . .Their names appeared in print, their images were

projected on the television screens and their faces appeared on marquees

wherever fight venues were located.  All of this produced a rare---and

beautiful---phenomenon.

It also produced, for King, a place in

the gunsights of jealous and envious persons in high positions in the sport. 

They inevitably took pot-shots at him and his perch often became precarious.

Yet, King has withstood the slings and arrows and his place in boxing is

well entrenched.

Few men in history have changed and dominated

a professional sport the way he has. His tally of megabuck fights---and

the promotional genius he puts behind them---are the stuff of which legends

are made. Don King is indeed the high potentate of the fight game.

The potentate, however, has had his share

of problems. His adversaries have included sports editors and boxing writers,

columnists. broadcasters, ringside railbirds, and even the federal government.

Their aim? Slay the giant (King) anyway they can!

Last week, the federal government--which

tried King, three times previously without success on trumped up Charges---listed

him as an unindicted co-conspirator in the case involving international

Boxing Federation President Bob Lee, Sr., in which the Feds charged Lee

with taking bribes to fix the rankings of fighters.

The case, which opened this week, will

be heard in New Jersey before U. S. District Court Judge John Bissall.

Depending on your perspective, the trial is an ultimate reflection of the

good, the bad, and the ugly.

The bad is that King has been named "an

unindicted co-conspirator. The ugly is that promoter Bob Arum, who admitted,

in a signed court declaration, that he paid a $100,000 bribe to IBF officials

to sanction a heavyweight championship fight between George Foreman and

Axel Schulz in Germany on April 22, 1995.

The good is that two well-known New York

Post writers--Jack Newfield and Wallace Matthews---who have bandied King

about in the past, seemed to exonerate him of any wrongdoing in the heavyweight

championship fight between Evander Holyfield and Lennox Lewis at Madison

Square Garden on March 13, 1999 that ended in a controversial draw.

King was made the scapegoat after that

fight, but he was not 'mentioned in a recent Post expose which revealed

that the $3 million-a year New York state boxing agency had turned into

a "cesspool of patronage and incompetence, with boxers often the victims."

Score one for Don. ..Back to the Arum mess and the odor it reaks.

It comes as no surprise that the matter

of Arum's bribery disclosure has been kept as quiet as a church mouse.

None of the major newspapers to date---except the Los Angeles Times which

ran a weak and meek piece on the subject---have dared touch the disclosure.

Pedro Fernandez, the ace boxing writer

and guru, who broke Arum's corruption Story world-wide on his website (www.fighters.com),

is of the opinion that "Had a certain black promoter put his signature

on paper admitting to such, it sure wouldn't take this (Nevada), or any

other commission four, almost five months to pull his license." Fernandez

is complaining that Arum had his press credential pulled for the Marco

Antonio Barrera-Erik Mosrales fight in Las Vegas with HBO's backing.

Is there an effort to provide protection

for Arum by the boxing hierarchy? Does race have a part in the ploy? People

inside and outside of boxing know the answer.  Race inevitably has

its role in all proceedings seemingly when King is involved.

Both, Bob Lee and King are black and both

are influential in the sport. Detractors will complain, "There you go again

with that race stuff." The retort is that this boxing probe is more about

race than it is about truth and justice.

A calculated effort is underway to destroy

King. Defense attorneys have indicated that they intend to make race an

issue in the trial.  "The thrust of this case is Don King," said Lee's

lawyer, John J. DeMassis. "Jurors may not have too many opinions about

boxers, they may not know too many boxers, but: I dare say they know King.

In the mind of Lee's councilor, this inquisition

is about race---race and money---race and big money.  King has said

all along that federal authorities are "chasing ghosts and apparitions"

in their investigation of him as part of a probe into boxing corruption.

"I'm not fearful of what they may or may

not find," he said. "because I did nothing wrong."

King said he believes that he is a primacy

target of investigators, because a number of his business associates have

been questioned about their dealings with him.  Oh, to be big, black,

rich and influential in America!

There seems to always be a move afoot to

besmirch the dignity of King. Perhaps, it is the price he must pay for

being successful and providing opportunities for those previously denied

entrance and access into the once-closed business side of boxing.

Don King kicked the door opened...Now,

he is being kicked in the backside for walking through the front door,

leaving it wide open for others to follow-

"Only in America," as King would say.

Tags:CommentaryArchive2001
Share:

Related Articles